Coding With Fun
Home Docker Django Node.js Articles Python pip guide FAQ Policy

Is there a translation loss from linq to sql?


Asked by Karsyn Bailey on Dec 07, 2021 SQL



Generally speaking, LINQ is a higher-level querying language than SQL which can cause translation loss when trying to convert SQL to LINQ. For one, LINQ emits shaped results and SQL flat result sets. The issue here is that an automatic translation from SQL to LINQ will often have to perform more transliteration than translation -...
Just so,
Translation of this method is possible for an ordered set but is not currently translated by LINQ to SQL. Translation of these methods is possible for an ordered set but is not currently translated by LINQ to SQL. SQL queries operate on multisets, not on indexable sequences. In general, a default value cannot be specified for an arbitrary tuple.
Consequently, Overflow might occur for a LINQ to SQL translation of Sum, even if the Standard Query Operator implementation does not cause an overflow for the corresponding in-memory sequence. Likewise, the LINQ to SQL translation of Average of integer values is computed as an integer, not as a double.
Keeping this in consideration,
For these reasons, a large percentage of our customers, nearly 95%, have come back to us for additional translation services, and over 80% are ‘regulars’ who utilize Certified Translation on an ongoing basis for all their document translation service needs. Contact us today at 1-866-201-2921.
Moreover,
The expertise, flexibility and dedication of our specialist Account Managers will ensure excellent customer service throughout the translation process and on-schedule delivery, regardless of the size or complexity of the project or the number of languages involved.