Coding With Fun
Home Docker Django Node.js Articles Python pip guide FAQ Policy

Why are transcendental arguments more demanding than deductive arguments?


Asked by Eugene McLean on Nov 29, 2021 FAQ



Transcendental arguments may have additional standards of justification that are more demanding than those of traditional deductive arguments. Typically, a transcendental argument starts from some accepted aspect of experience, and then deduces what must be true for that type of experience to be possible.
In fact,
Answer: The transcendental argument for the existence of God is the argument which attempts to prove God’s existence by arguing that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose the Christian worldview and that God’s transcendent character is the source of logic and morals.
Also, What is a Deductive Argument? A deductive argument is one in which true premises guarantee a true conclusion. In other words, it is impossible for the premises to be true but the conclusion false. Thus, the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises and inferences.
Next,
In this way, it is hoped, skepticism can be overturned using transcendental arguments that embody such transcendental claims. At first sight, this anti-skeptical potential of such arguments makes them seem powerful and attractive, by offering a proof of what otherwise might seem to be known only through inductive reasoning or fallible experience.
Subsequently,
Perhaps because of its brevity and relative clarity, but also perhaps because of the hope it can be made ‘self-standing’ and independent of the (to some) disreputable machinery of transcendental idealism [see §3 of the entry on Immanuel Kant ], it is the Refutation that has become the paradigm to many of a transcendental argument.