Coding With Fun
Home Docker Django Node.js Articles Python pip guide FAQ Policy

Which is more efficient utf 8 or utf 16?


Asked by Vincenzo Jenkins on Dec 14, 2021 FAQ



But, UTF-8 is the preferred and most efficient representation in Swift 5. For any ASCII portion of a string’s content, UTF-8 uses 50% less memory than UTF-16. For any portion comprised of latter- BMP scalars, UTF-8 uses 50% more memory than UTF-16.
Likewise,
Theoretically, UTF-16 is more space efficient, but in practical UTF-8 is more space efficient as most of the characters (98% of data) for processing are ASCII and UTF-8 try to represent them with single byte and UTF-16 try to represent them with 2 bytes. Also, UTF-8 is superset of ASCII encoding.
Thereof, Limitations of UTF-8 1 As UTF-8 is a variable-width encoding format, the number of bytes in a text cannot be resolved from the number of Unicode characters. 2 The variable length of the UTF-8 code is often problematic. 3 Where Extended ASCII needs only a single byte for non-Latin characters, UTF-8 adopts 2 bytes. More items...
Next,
Windows uses UTF-16 internally, so on Windows, that is the obvious choice. Linux varies a bit, but they generally use UTF-8 for everything that is Unicode-compliant. So short answer: All three encodings can encode the same character set, but they represent each character as different byte sequences.
Consequently,
Unicode assigns a unique “code point” to every character in every human language. UTF-8 is a Unicode character encoding method. This means that UTF-8 takes the code point for a given Unicode character and translates it into a string of binary.