Coding With Fun
Home Docker Django Node.js Articles Python pip guide FAQ Policy

Which is easier to prove, specific intent or general intent?


Asked by Charlee Maxwell on Nov 29, 2021 FAQ



General intent is less sophisticated than specific intent. Thus general intent crimes are easier to prove and can also result in a less severe punishment. A basic definition of general intent is the intent to perform the criminal act or actus reus.
Likewise,
General Intent. General intent is less sophisticated than specific intent. Thus general intent crimes are easier to prove and can also result in a less severe punishment. A basic definition of general intent is the intent to perform the criminal act or actus reus.
And, General intent crimes don’t require proof that a person intended to cause the harm or the result that occurred. Rather, the prosecution only needs to prove the defendant intended to commit the act and that it wasn’t an accident.
One may also ask,
Only general intent must be proved, only mens rea need be established, specific intent must be proved, proof of intent is generally not required. A: proof of intent is generally not required To establish general intent at common law, the prosecution had to prove the defendant:
Furthermore,
The two levels of intent will be listed in the statute that defines the crime. Specific intent crimes are usually indicated by the use of such words as intentionally, knowingly, purposely, or willfully.