Coding With Fun
Home Docker Django Node.js Articles Python pip guide FAQ Policy

Which is better to use jslink or xslt?


Asked by Donovan Wise on Dec 15, 2021 FAQ



Client-side rendering using JSLink has a number of advantages over XSL/XSLT. In the first place, it uses JavaScript, with which most Web developers are already comfortable. XSLT is somewhat more complex to develop and debug, so JSLink can reduce development time with no loss of accuracy.
Keeping this in consideration,
SharePoint has more tokens for URL construction. To learn more about URL strings and tokens, see the Dev Center at bit.ly/1lpYuAP. Client-side rendering using JSLink has a number of advantages over XSL/XSLT. In the first place, it uses JavaScript, with which most Web developers are already comfortable.
Similarly, It is somehow nicer than to use HTML parsers, especially since HTML code can be changed at any moment. XSLT, when used in websites, allow strict separation between HTML and code-behind, which enables to hire a developer for code-behind and another developer for HTML/CSS stuff.
Next,
JSLink is a property that controls rendering of fields, items and even Web Parts through a JavaScript file. This article will explore the use of JSLink with the help of two demo scenarios. The first scenario will demonstrate how you can use color-coded messages to indicate task completion, for example, as shown in Figure 1.
In respect to this,
XSLT is pretty much dead because only a few enthusiasts still use it. However, there is no real alternative for it. If you focus only on a single use case, such as for example rendering of HTML pages from semantic documents, you find better tools.