Coding With Fun
Home Docker Django Node.js Articles Python pip guide FAQ Policy

Which is better amps queue or rabbitmq queue?


Asked by Axl Moreno on Dec 10, 2021 FAQ



AMPS Queues are durable by default and are able to achieve 40x the throughput of RabbitMQ with better durability and message delivery guarantees. AMPS Queues are durable by default and are able to achieve 40x the throughput of RabbitMQ with better durability and message delivery guarantees.
Next,
AMPS allows the user to create a real-time aggregated view of the contents of the queue as messages are added to and consumed from the queue. With AMPS, the user’s view of the messages in the queue isn’t limited to queue depth or consumption rate.
Consequently, Now let’s see how a message queue (RabbitMQ specifically) works: A publisher worker constructs a message (usually in JSON format). The publisher worker publishes the message to an MQ Exchange. The MQ broker will route the message to a designated queue based on the predefined routing rule. The message is consumed by a consumer worker and processed.
Also Know,
In effect, each queue is an independent view of the messages within the AMPS transaction log. As messages are delivered and consumed, AMPS simply tracks the state of that message in the view. The producer of a message needs no knowledge of either the distribution model or the consumer of the message.
Besides,
SB has a type of filter called a correlation filter which provides the same functionality as the RabbitMQ routing key. SB uses namespace entities to provide equivalent functionality to virtual hosts. These two elements create a queue of subject / subject / exchange type entities. All queues are persistent with SQL Server used for persistence.